This is a print preview of this page

A printed page wil not show this message. Return to page.

London - Campaign to Protect Rural England

FLIGHT BLIGHT - the environmental and social costs of aviation expansion

Tuesday, 28 January 2020 09:45

For many people, aircraft noise is a real problem. Research shows that aircraft noise is more ‘annoying’ than road or rail noise and that we are becoming increasingly sensitive to it.

Tolerance to aircraft noise is about more than the noise level, non-acoustic, socio-psychological factors play a key role, including expectations. If you are ‘expecting’ peace and quiet, for example in the countryside, then noise is much more ‘annoying.’ People who ‘trust’ an airport find aircraft noise less ‘annoying.’ Other European countries monitor and report at lower noise threshold levels than the UK as this better reflects people’s experience of aircraft noise. The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) provides Independent advice to government on building a low-carbon economy and preparing for climate change. It has recommended that the government plans for international aviation and shipping to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 and that this should be reflected in the government’s forthcoming Aviation Strategy. The CCC states that it will be necessary to reduce actual emissions from the aviation sector. Until now, there has been a natural cap on aviation emissions due to runway capacity. If greater capacity is supported, then there will be unwanted growth in carbon emissions.

For more details of our new research download our report Flight Blight below:

 

Downloads:

© CPRE | London, 70 Cowcross Street, London, EC1M 6EJ | Tel:020 7253 0300, | Email: office@cprelondon.org.uk, | Web: www.cprelondon.org.uk
Registered charity number: 802622 I Privacy Policy I