News
Here you will find the major news stories that we are taking an active interest in.
Response to Kingston's Local Plan consultation
CPRE London responded to the Kingston Local Plan consultation in July 2019 raising concerns about indications that the Borough may be considering allocating protected Green Belt and/or Metropolitan Open Land for development.
Postcode lottery for walkers, cyclists and healthy streets claim campaigners
New scorecard shows wide variation between London boroughs’ progress towards the Mayor’s key transport targets
London Green Spaces Commission
We recently made a submission to the London Green Space Commission's review of the management and funding of London's parks. We called for.....
We are delighted to announce this major new partnership project funded by the City of London Corporation's charitable funder, City Bridge Trust. Download further information below:
Space for over 280,000 homes on brownfield land in London 'just the tip of the iceberg'
Please call Neil Sinden on 020 7253 0300/07496 805354 for further information
Space for over 280,000 homes on brownfield sites in London ‘just the tip of the iceberg’ say local campaigners
London’s brownfield land is a renewable resource that can provide a steady pipeline of new homes
A new analysis of councils’ Brownfield Land Registers, published today (25 March) by the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), demonstrates the huge potential that building on derelict and vacant land has for the regeneration of towns and cities, as well as the provision of new homes [1].
The analysis shows that in London alone there is space on suitable ‘brownfield land’– land that has been previously built on and now sits derelict or vacant – to accommodate over 287,000 homes [2]. Almost two thirds of this land is ‘shovel ready’ and could make an immediate contribution to meeting housing need, having been confirmed as deliverable within five years. And CPRE London believes these figures seriously underestimate the actual amount of brownfield land available.
Prioritising re-use of brownfield land, which councils have shown is ready and waiting to be redeveloped, would not only help to transform run-down areas, and provide more homes, but also prevent the loss of precious countryside and green spaces for housing.
Neil Sinden, Director of CPRE London said:
“London’s Green Belt is under growing threat of development with Government Inspectors only this week [3] questioning the approach to meeting housing needs being taken by the Mayor in the new London Plan. The Plan currently proposes strict protection of Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land and prioritising the use of brownfield land which we strongly support. Yet developers and others are calling for Green Belt protection to be relaxed.”
Our new report shows just how much capacity there is to provide housing on brownfield land in London – enough for over 10 years housing supply at recent rates of housebuilding. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Our recent work in Enfield [4] suggests that actual brownfield capacity is well over 10 times that suggested by the figures collected by councils in their Brownfield Land Registers. And if homes are built at sustainable densities, the capacity would be even greater.
Neil Sinden concluded:
‘We now have the opportunity to provide the new homes London so desperately needs by revitalising run-down urban areas while safeguarding our precious green spaces. To achieve this we need a positive brownfield-first approach coupled with the strict protection of the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land proposed in the London Plan’.
ENDS
Notes to editors
- CPRE, State of Brownfield 2019 - This report will be available on the CPRE website after the embargo has lifted. If required before this, please email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for a copy.
- Breakdown of key statistics in Brownfield Land Registers in Greater London (All the sites on the registers have been assessed by local planning authorities as being ‘suitable’ for housing development, having had regard to their environmental, amenity and heritage value):.
Local Planning Authority |
Number of sites |
Total area (hectares) |
Total minimum housing capacity |
Minimum housing capacity of deliverable sites |
|
Barking and Dagenham |
63 |
277 |
23,488 |
15,444 |
|
Barnet |
83 |
242 |
18,594 |
15,935 |
|
Bexley |
47 |
16 |
1,914 |
1,891 |
|
Brent |
112 |
69 |
12,235 |
10,085 |
|
Bromley |
61 |
45 |
3,097 |
722 |
|
Camden |
97 |
43 |
6,262 |
2,859 |
|
City of London |
1 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
|
Croydon |
249 |
107 |
11,236 |
8,454 |
|
Ealing |
70 |
112 |
7,026 |
6,702 |
|
Enfield |
27 |
50 |
2,170 |
2,170 |
|
Greenwich |
101 |
133 |
23,478 |
23,023 |
|
Hackney |
23 |
5 |
3,374 |
||
Hammersmith and Fulham |
14 |
9 |
2,554 |
2554 |
|
Haringey |
179 |
161 |
18,800 |
18,800 |
|
Harrow |
102 |
102 |
7,634 |
7,586 |
|
Havering |
78 |
100 |
12,382 |
9,267 |
|
Hillingdon |
84 |
125 |
6,582 |
4,227 |
|
Hounslow |
9 |
11 |
1,171 |
1,171 |
|
Islington |
83 |
58 |
6,260 |
4,830 |
|
Kensington and Chelsea |
50 |
38 |
7,132 |
2,223 |
|
Kingston upon Thames |
80 |
39 |
5,707 |
1,235 |
|
Lambeth |
36 |
32 |
3,976 |
2,884 |
|
Lewisham |
128 |
96 |
16,425 |
13,516 |
|
London Legacy DC |
3 |
7.2 |
1000 |
1000 |
|
Merton |
83 |
31 |
1,102 |
||
Newham |
68 |
9 |
1,245 |
387 |
|
Old Oak and Park Royal DC |
41 |
57.6 |
20,505 |
4,715 |
|
Redbridge |
186 |
128 |
12,579 |
6,023 |
|
Richmond upon Thames |
50 |
79 |
1,980 |
1,491 |
|
Southwark |
346 |
65 |
9,547 |
5,221 |
|
Sutton |
103 |
48 |
3,265 |
||
Tower Hamlets |
26 |
96 |
130 |
||
Waltham Forest |
38 |
20 |
3,441 |
3,390 |
|
Wandsworth |
175 |
194 |
24,706 |
22,777 |
|
Westminster |
101 |
35 |
6,049 |
977 |
|
TOTAL |
|
2,997 |
2,642 |
287,051 |
170,185 |
- On Tuesday 26 March Government Inspectors will question the Mayor’s approach to the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land at the examination in public of the draft London Plan at City Hall.
- Recent research by CPRE London in the Borough of Enfield found space for at least 37,000 homes on a wide range of types of brownfield land. This is compared to just 2,170 homes identified on Enfield’s most recently published register in December 2017 – see Space to Build in Enfield (February, 2019). The requirement in the regulations for the registers that land should be ‘available for residential development’ and the definition of that term in article 4(2) may result in missing opportunities to make better use of existing developed sites. For example, supermarkets and their car parks could be converted to provide homes whilst maintaining existing uses.
Please call Neil Sinden on 020 7253 0300/07496 805354 for further information